Talk:Danger Beasts

I figured that, since we don't have information or rather 'motivation', we should discuse our "future" plans here (if we're ever to do them).MAD SOULER (talk) 17:33, October 9, 2014 (UTC)


 * I think that as long as we have enough info for at least a "Stub" class article, it is worth doing it. There are already three articles done. We have enough information to expand at least three more I think. For the others, the stub could be reduced to description (self-made from anime or manga), whatever info the appearance adds, and the chapter/episode it appears. With this, and the picture, we have enough for a stub.Coquidragon (talk) 05:44, October 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * For example, the water dragon was used for a teigu/shingu(?)(I don't remember which). The Kaiser Frog is a puppet for Kurome that I forgot to add to my list. The Air Mantas have had many appearances, etc...--Coquidragon (talk) 05:49, October 10, 2014 (UTC)

Technically, we should have created separate articles for Kaiser Frog (species) and Kurome's Kaiser Frog. But I don't really think it's necessary, as we could just add short descriptions of "minor" species right on this page. --kiadony --talk to me-- 07:53, October 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * Actually, if we do this, to be consistent, we would also need to do it for the other two Danger Beast puppets. However, doing the article for the Beast itself, and then adding a section in the article for "Puppets," where it is said this species was used as such, etc.. and the details/history of the puppet itself, I think would suffice.Coquidragon (talk) 08:05, October 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * Those two other Danger Beast puppets were too unimportant, I'd say - they were literally cannon fodder. An image somewhere would be enough for them. As to Kaiser Frog, yeah, I guess one article describing it both as a species and as a puppet could work.


 * Something like this:

{| class=wikitable width=410 align=center

Overview
Kaiser Frog is a Danger Beast species, so-and-so, strong acid.

Kurome's Kaiser Frog
Kurome's Kaiser Frog, so-and-so, killed by Mine. --kiadony --talk to me-- 08:15, October 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * }


 * Actually, I was speaking about Apeman and Desta-Ghoul.
 * Your example seems adequate. Can you do it for the other two? It seems to me you are the right person for the job.--Coquidragon (talk) 08:34, October 10, 2014 (UTC)

I believe Desta-Ghoul is a unique beast. I'm not sure about Apeman. Can we somehow confirm that its species is called the same? --kiadony --talk to me-- 11:26, October 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * I think Apeman is unique, too. If we take into consideration that Tatsumi never saw one before, it's safe to presume that the Apeman species are not familiar to the empire. They could be from the south or some other place.MAD SOULER (talk) 12:55, October 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * Desta-Ghoul was found hibernating. It might be unique to this time (we don't know), but not necessarily a unique specimen. Apeman, I really don't think is a unique specimen. I believe we should assume they are species (Theory of Evolution), unless told otherwise, like it happenned with Tyrant. We are told that Tyrant was one Danger Beast which attacked the Empire and eventually learned to hide its presence, before being trapped and made into a Teigu, but that it survived somehow within it.Coquidragon (talk) 14:02, October 10, 2014 (UTC)

October 11
Since we don't have info regarding water dragons other than they were used to create a shingu, should we list them as "mentioned only"?MAD SOULER (talk) 18:59, October 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * We can add short description of minor danger beasts to the main page, so that we don't have to make tiny pages for them. --kiadony --talk to me-- 19:03, October 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * We can create a redirect from Water Dragon to either a section within the Danger Beasts article, or to a section within the Water Dragon sword article (is it a sword? I thought it was the Danger Beast behind Black Marlin. Don't worry I'll read the articles and find out) Regardless, what do you think?--Coquidragon (talk) 05:56, October 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * It's better if it would redirect to the Danger Beasts page. Most people haven't even heard of AGK!Zero.MAD SOULER (talk) 06:22, October 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * Actually, after reading your words, I thought the contrary. If we put redirect it to the sword's page: first, we won't have a circular redirect withing Danger Beasts; second, we would help make AgK0 more know; third, we can keep the Danger Beast page consistent between all beasts, since all of them will be listed with no further expansion. Within the sword page, there we can add a section with a line or such explaining that not much is known about this danger, etc... We would wikilink 'water dragon' in the text in the article, but not in the small section. That way, we won't have a circular redirect. What do you think?--Coquidragon (talk) 06:46, October 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * It's true that it would be better for the other Danger Beasts' pages, but for the water dragon sword, I'm not so sure. It would disturb the continuity of the page. The problem would be categorizing the page. If you find a solution, I would be most grateful, because there would be less work along with more efficiency.
 * Sorry if I'm interupting somerhing but, what is a koga tuna? I can't remember it being metioned anywhere.MAD SOULER (talk) 07:20, October 12, 2014 (UTC)